Recent Posts
- Pennsylvania Makes a Major Move
- It's Payback Time
- Voter ID law is good for families
- NRA Ratings for Selected Statehouse Primary Races
- Hoosier Access Endorses a House District 50 Candidate
- Supreme Court Upholds Hoosier Voter ID Law; 6-3 Ruling Sends Dan Parker Home to Cry
- Supreme Court Upholds Indiana Photo ID Law
- Indiana Voter I.D. Law Upheld
- What is it about God and license plates?
- Governor Daniels endorses Mike Murphy
Monthly Archive
What Is Victory Bloggers?
Victory Bloggers is a place for the Rightroots in Indiana to unite in support of a Republican majority in the Indiana House of Representatives.
Sign up to receive special insider updates and be added to our blogroll. We will periodically feature the best content from internet activists all over the state. We will also be posting announcements of special blogger events and conference calls.
Get the Inside Track! Become a Victory Blogger today!
Hide
Hide
April 29, 2008
5:50 AM
Supreme Court Upholds Indiana Photo ID Law
ndiana Democrats have argued for the last several years that 1) requiring voters to prove who they are by showing an ID is unconstitutional and 2) that no vote fraud exists in Indiana.
Democrats aren't likely to ever give up on their second argument; election fraud master Bob Pastrick is still their national committeeman and representative to the DNC. (Did nobody in the party see Sautter’s “King of Steeltown?”). But the Supreme Court had the final say today on the Indiana voter ID case today, and you can bet Indiana Democrats aren't happy.
For those of you scoring at home, mark this up as another big win for Secretary of State Todd Rokita. Original Article by FH From Frugal Hoosiers“The Supreme Court ruled Monday that states can require voters to produce photo identification without violating their constitutional rights, validating Republican-inspired voter ID laws.
“The law “is amply justified by the valid interest in protecting 'the integrity and reliability of the electoral process,”' Justice John Paul Stevens said in an opinion that was joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy.
Justices Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas also agreed with the outcome, but wrote separately.
Justices Stephen Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and David Souter dissented.”
