Republican tour continues in New Albany

Reps. Brian Bosma and Eric Turner visited New Albany last week to continue to promote the Republican property tax relief program passed this general assembly.

The News and Tribune:

The two were in Evansville on Wednesday before making the drive to New Albany. Their message has been one of support for the property-tax relief package, which will include $620 million in aid for 2008.

 

“The burden of property taxes was becoming unbearable for homeowners,” Turner said.

 

Jackie Walorski's Capitol Letters Blog

Jackie Walorski gives us a round-up of this session on her blog. Here's some of what she had to say.

The 2008 Indiana General Assembly is now in the history books and will certainly go down as a session that delivered some major wins for taxpayers. Especially the 30-40% immediate property tax cut for Elkhart and St. Joseph County homeowners. Let me tell you, those wins didn’t come easily. It was a fight all along the way with those who felt they knew how to spend your money better than you. Not only that, it was a battle to convince them that no Hoosier should ever lose their home because of high taxes. I still firmly believe that until we actually “eliminate” the property tax it will be a source of many court battles and fights between local and state governments. But faced with limited options, this tax plan was the only one that I felt brought some immediate relief to Hoosiers this year.

Republican caucus members visit Marion

Republican members of the Indiana House visited Marion on Tuesday to discuss the property tax reform bill that passed the house. 

From the Chronicle-Tribune:

Eight House Republicans came to Marion City Hall, 301 S. Branson St., to discuss the recent legislative session and to answer questions from the public. The No. 1 topic was property tax relief and how it could affect residents of Grant County.

 

“It was a piece of landmark legislation,” Rep. Jeff Espich said of the property tax relief plan that was passed Friday by the legislature. “It’ll change the way we do business here in Indiana.”

 

While the statewide average savings in property taxes is around 30 percent, Espich said Grant County residents could see a 35 percent cut from what they would have paid in property taxes this year, then a 39 percent cut in 2009 and a 40 percent cut in 2010.

Knollman takes case for referendums to district

Representative Knollman recently spoke with voters in Liberty, IN about legislative issues. There he made the common sense Republican case for allowing voters to have input on school construction projects.

From the Palladium Item:

Knollman, R-Liberty, said his constituent survey showed people want the right to vote on building projects.

 

"Do we think voters are dumb? Do we think they're stupid? We need to look at referendums," Knollman said.

Too bad the Democrats don’t have the same common sense on this issue. HV08 thinks it may have a lot to do with their “special friends” at the teacher’s union.ublican case for allowing voters to have input on school construction projects.

Need A Reason for Referendum and Reform?

If you need a reason to support the Republican-backed referendums, look no further than to what’s happening in the Center Grove area in Johnson County.  Note that the Johnson County Daily Journal requires a subscription to read the full text:

Two Center Grove elementary schools will be closed and sold, two will be expanded or renovated, and a new elementary school will be built if a plan by school officials is accepted.

The change would make Center Grove’s five remaining elementary schools larger, housing 650 to 750 students, and follow Gov. Mitch Daniels’ request for schools to consolidate and operate more efficiently, Superintendent Steven Stephanoff said. The project is being done quickly to get approval before state legislators make major changes to the property tax system, he added.

So let’s get this straight.  The Center Grove Superintendent is pushing a major construction project for the district.  He wants to get it approved NOW.  Why?

GOP, Indy Star: Give the people a voice, Dems: No way

That’s how it seems to be shaking out, and it’s disappointing. Even the Indianapolis Star editorial board seems to be perplexed.

One new amendment, approved by House Democrats voting along party lines, would limit school construction referendums to those projects not directly tied to classroom instruction. Taxpayers under the proposal could still decide whether to build a new high school football stadium but wouldn't be able to vote on whether proposed classroom buildings are excessively expensive.

Opponents of referendums fear that taxpayers would be too stingy, blocking necessary construction to the detriment of students. But Hoosiers have shown repeatedly that they're willing to spend money on education when school administrators make clear that needs -- and not mere wants -- truly exist.

Taxpayers already have oversight of sorts through a remonstrance process. But it's a convoluted system that lacks transparency.

What opponents of referendums are really saying is that they fear taxpayers are unable to make wise decisions about how their money should be spent. That's not an attitude the General Assembly should embrace.

House Republicans, however, are clear. There is nothing dangerous about giving voters a voice in local school construction projects. Why the Democrats don’t trust the people is a mystery.

Republicans focused on restraining the excesses of government

Let’s be clear.  As Republicans, we understand that increases in property taxes haven’t materialized from nowhere.

They came because government isn’t living within its means.

That’s why we support a state spending cap and support giving voters a voice in local government spending projects.  The Indianapolis Star editorial board agrees.  The Democrats, however, have rejected giving voters a say and shot down spending caps.

More Republican ideas to save taxpayers money: Democrats continue to dig a debt hole

If we’ve learned one thing from the final version of HB 1001, it’s that Republicans have emphasized fiscal responsibility while Democrats have been looking for ways to create more problems.

Take Rep. Dan Leonard’s idea to save money on school construction.

Last year, three new schools were built in the 50th District, and they were all very similar, but all had separate building plans. Rep. Leonard’s amendment, the Little Red Schoolhouse Amendment, would require the state to have school building plans already drawn up for counties to use. This would save Hoosier taxpayers millions of dollars in design fees.

“School construction is a large portion of local government costs,” said Rep. Leonard. “By moving to pre-designed school construction plans, we will reduce cost to counties, cutting property taxes. Many other states, such as Florida, have already successfully instituted statewide school building plans.”

General Assembly - 1, Rep. Craig Fry - 0

The House just passed the majority of the Governor's property tax relief plan (supported by House Republicans) by a vote of 93-1. Great. The General Assembly agrees. Score one for the good guys!

Democrat Craig Fry, protector of all things ridiculous, voted against it. This may be because he couldn't force Pat Bauer into giving him some sort of special earmark like in the 2007 budget. See Fry's own press release bragging about his 2007 feat at http://www.in.gov/legislative/house_democrats/fry_press_20070223.html.

Sorry Craig, no money for your pocket this time.

Here's the coverage of the bill passage from the Indy Star.

We need radical change- that is, while leaving everything the same

Voters in 2007 (and soon in 2008) have let elected officials know that they want change. Fundamentally, Republicans understand that you can't have change in state government without... change. Democrats, however, don't seem to agree.

It's clear that Hoosiers feel they've been taxed too much. Republicans agree. That's why House Republicans have supported a spending cap. It's a simple concept - let's make government live within its means so that we can return money to the taxpayers.

The Democrats? Let's leave things the way they are.

How about giving voters a chance to vote on government spending- particularly school construction projects? Republicans said "let's give voters a say."